Comparative study on the performance of natural and synthesized adsorbents onto uranium (VI) sorption

  • Naima Bayou Nuclear Research Center of Draria, (CRND/COMENA), Sebala, Draria PO Box 43, Algiers, Algeria
  • Fatima Houhoune Nuclear Research Center of Draria, (CRND/COMENA), Sebala, Draria PO Box 43, Algiers, Algeria
  • Sihem Khemaissia Nuclear Research Center of Draria, (CRND/COMENA), Sebala, Draria PO Box 43, Algiers, Algeria
  • Hamid Aït-Amar Laboratory of Engineering Sciences of Industrial Process, University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene, USTHB, BP 32, 16111 El-Alia, , Bab Ezzouar, Algiers, Algeria
  • Ali Lounis Laboratory of Material Science and Engineering, University of Sciences and Technology Houari Boumediene, BP 32, 16111 El Alia, Bab Ezzouar, Algiers, Algeria
Keywords: Uranium, Algerian Aleppo Pine sawdust, Chemical activation, Silico-Alumino-Phosphate material, Adsorption

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the performance of natural and synthesized material to adsorb uranium. Synthesized Silico-Alumino-Phosphate (SAPO) material is compared to raw and chemically activated Algerian Aleppo pine sawdust (Raw-AAPS and CA-AAPS). The uranium sorption parameters, isotherms modelling, kinetic modelling and decontamination factor results, showed that adsorbents used are effective for the removal of uranium (VI) ions and the performance of the adsorbents follows the order: SAPO > CA-AAPS> Raw-AAPS. The natural material presents less sorption capacity comparatively to the synthesized adsorbent, but it is economically favored because of its abundance in nature and its low cost.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

1. Zhang S, Yuan D, Zhang Q, Wan Y, Liu Y, Zhao J, Chen B. Highly efficient removal of uranium from highly acidic media achieved using a phosphine oxide and amino functionalized superparamagnetic composite polymer adsorbent. J Mater Chem. 2020; A 8: 10925-10934.
2. Cheng J G , Leng Y, Gu R, Yang G, Wang Y, Tuo X. Adsorption of uranium (VI) from groundwater by amino-functionalized clay”, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2021; 327: 1365–1373.
3. Ting X, Qichen L, Jun L ,Yong Z , Wenkun Z. Highly enhanced adsorption performance to uranium(VI) by facile synthesized hydroxyapatite aerogel. J Hazard Mater.2022; 423: 127-184.
4. Wenjie L , Qingliang W , Hongqiang W, Qi X, Wei H , Eming H , Zhiwu L. Adsorption of uranium by chitosan/Chlorella pyrenoidosa composite adsorbent bearing phosphate ligand. Chemosphere.2022; 287: 132-193.
5. Bayou N, Ait-Amar H, Belkhiri S, Bouhila Z, Houhoune F, Khemaissia S, Azli T. Equilibrium,isotherms and kinetic studies of uranium sorption onto AlPO4-5 and SAPO-5 materials”. C R Chimie.2021; 24 : 373-384.
6. Bayou N, Ait-Amar H, Attou M, Menacer S. Removal of uranium (VI) from nuclear effluents onto aluminophosphate and silico-aluminophosphate molecular sieves, C R Chimie. 2017; 20:704-709
7. Menacer S, Lounis A, Guedioura B, Bayou N. Uranium removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption on Aleppo pine sawdust, modified by NaOH and neutron irradiation. Desalin Water Treat.2015; 1-12.
8. Mingxin Z, Lijia L, Jie F, Hongxing D, Chunhong Z, Fuqiu M ,Qiang W. Efficient uranium adsorption by amidoximized porous polyacrylonitrile with hierarchical pore structure prepared by freeze-extraction. J Mol Liq.2021; 328:115-304.
9. Wan Ngah W S, Hanafiah M A K M. Removal of heavy metal ions wastewater by chemically modified plant wastes as adsorbents. Bioresour Technol.2008; 99:3935-3948.
10. Argun M E, Dursun S, Ozdemir C, Karatas M. Heavy metal adsorption by modified oak sawdust: thermodynamics and kinetics. J Hazard Mater .2007; B141: 77-85.
11. Semerjian L. Removal of heavy metals (Cu, Pb) from aqueous solutions using pine (Pinushalepensis) sawdust: Equilibrium, kinetic, and thermodynamic studies. Environ Technol Innov.2018; 12: 91-103.
12. Shadpour M, Fariba S , Chaudhery M H. Sawdust, a versatile, inexpensive, readily available bio-waste: From mother earth to valuable materials for sustainable remediation technologies. Adv Colloid Interface Sci.2021; 295: 102-492.
13. Menacer S. Elaboration and characterization of an adsorbent: “Aleppo pine sawdust chemically activated and by irradiation" for the treatment of radioactive waste Ph.D thesis, University of science and Technology Houari Boumediene, Algiers, Algeria. 2016.
14. Flanigen E M, Patton R L, Wilson S T.Structural, Synthetic and Physicochemical Concepts in Aluminophosphate-Based Molecular Sieves. Stud Surf Sci Catal.1988; 37: 13-27
15. Jianfeng C, Runqiu G, Panqing H, Yuelong P, Yangchun L, Yu L, Yanhui W, Xianguo T. Study on the uranium U(VI) adsorption stability of high-dose γ-ray-irradiated clay. Appl Radiat Isot.2022;110102
16. Chikri R, Elhadiri N, Benchanaa M, El MaguanaY. Efficiency of sawdust as low- cost adsorbent for dyes removal. J Chem. 2020; 2020:1-17.
17. Krestou A, Xenidis A, Panias D. Mechanism of aqueous uranium (VI) uptake by natural zeolitic tuff. Miner Eng. 2003; 16:1363-1370.
18. Habib R, Mohammad S, Imtiaz A, Sher S, Hameedullah. Sorption studies of Nickel ions onto sawdust of Dalbergiasissoo. J. Chin. Chem. Soc.2006; 53:1045-1052
19. Jain M, Garg V K, Kadirvelu K. Removal of Ni(II) from aqueous system by chemically modified sunflower biomass. Desalin Water Treat.2001, 52: 5681-5695.
20. Jhung S H, Hwang Y K, Chang J S, Park S E. Effect of acidity and anions on synthesis of AFI molecular sieves in wide pH range of 3–10. Micropor Mesopor Mat.2014; 67:151-157.
21. Boparai H K, Joseph M, O’Carroll D M. Kinetics and thermodynamics of cadmium ion removal by adsorption onto nano zerovalent iron particles. J Hazard Mater.2011; 186: 458-465
22. Tan L, Liu Q, Jing X, Liu J, Song D, Hu S, Liu L, Wang J. Removal of uranium (VI) ions from aqueous solution by magnetic cobalt ferrite/multiwalled carbon nanotubes composites. Chem. Eng. J. 2015; 273: 307-315
23. Sureshkumar M K, Das D, Mallia M B, Gupta P C. Adsorption of uranium from aqueous solution using chitosan-tripolyphosphate (CTPP) beads. J Hazard Mater. 2010; 184: 65-72
24. Camachoa L M, Denga S, Parra R R. Uranium removal from groundwater by natural clinoptilolite zeolite: Effects of pH and initial feed concentration. J Hazard Mater.2010; 175: 393-398.
25. Izadbakhsh A, Farhadi F, Khorasheh F, Sahebdelfar S, Asadi M, Feng Y Z. Effect of SAPO-34's composition on its physico-chemical properties and deactivation in MTO process. Appl. Catal A: General. 2009; 364 (1-2): 48–56
26. Jain M, Yadav M, Chaudhry S. Copper oxide nanoparticles for the removal of divalent nickel ions from aqueous solution. Toxin Rev.2020; 40(2):1-14.
27. Arias D, Colmenares A, Cubeiro M L, Goldwasser J, Lopez C M, Machado F J, Sazo V. The Transformation of ethanol over AlPO4 and SAPO molecular-sieves with AEL and AFI topology-kinetic and thermodynamic approach. Catal Lett. 1997;45: 51-58.
Comparative study on the performance of natural and synthesized adsorbents onto uranium (VI) sorption
Published
2023-12-28
How to Cite
1.
Bayou N, Houhoune F, Khemaissia S, Aït-Amar H, Lounis A. Comparative study on the performance of natural and synthesized adsorbents onto uranium (VI) sorption. Alger. J. Eng. Technol. [Internet]. 2023Dec.28 [cited 2024Oct.15];8(2):228-37. Available from: https://jetjournal.org/index.php/ajet/article/view/377